No one maintains the system model
Database telemetry cannot see application intent. Code tools cannot see production behavior. Infrastructure context arrives in a third place.
Application + database + infrastructure, understood together
Sentiko builds a living model of how your application, database, and infrastructure work together. It turns that context into a holistic plan, keeps the work moving across your tools, and brings you in only when a decision needs you.
SEN-142 · Active initiative
Four agent-owned steps are moving. One release-window decision needs the application team.
The real bottleneck
Application code, query behavior, schema, infrastructure, deployments, and team decisions live in different systems. Engineers reconstruct that context by hand—then become the workflow engine that keeps every follow-up moving.
Database telemetry cannot see application intent. Code tools cannot see production behavior. Infrastructure context arrives in a third place.
Someone has to turn findings into a plan, chase owners, preserve constraints, notice drift, and decide what happens next.
Reasoning, team context, failed attempts, and production outcomes disappear into dashboards, tickets, pull requests, and chat history.
Continuous coverage
Sentiko evaluates evidence across application code, query behavior, plans, schema, database settings, infrastructure, and deployment history. A growing catalog turns those signals into precise findings about inefficiencies, reliability concerns, and persistence-layer security risks.
More signals do not mean more noise. Evidence, impact, and confidence gates determine what is worth bringing to your team.
Sentiko learns normal query and workload behavior, then detects new hot paths, plan shifts, capacity pressure, configuration drift, and other meaningful regressions.
Production baselines · deploy-aware · continuously re-evaluatedCode and migration changes are evaluated against live workload and system context for likely query, transaction, schema, connection, security, and operational regressions. Predictions remain distinct from measured production results.
Application diffs · migrations · production verificationRun a full persistence-layer audit at any time, or target a service, code path, query, schema, table, change, or risk category. The findings enter the same system model and plan.
Full posture · targeted scope · one durable resultOne living system, one current plan
Sentiko continuously connects what the application intends, what Postgres is doing, what the infrastructure can support, and what your team has already learned.
Sentiko joins application structure and intent with query behavior, schema and indexes, deployment history, infrastructure conditions, and the decisions your team has already made.
Sentiko does not stop at a recommendation. It defines the goal, success metric, dependencies, owners, guardrails, observation windows, and the sequence of application and infrastructure work required to reach the outcome.
Confirm query ownership and competing workAgent · evidence criterion met
DonePredict benefit and bound write riskAgent · HypoPG + workload model
DonePrepare the guarded interventionAgent · checks and rollback attached
RunningConfirm an uncontaminated release windowApplication owner · one precise decision
Needs youObserve the production success metricAgent · begins after deployment
QueuedSentiko advances routine steps, watches dependencies, carries context between tools, and re-plans when reality changes. People are pulled in for judgment, approval, or missing organizational context—not status chasing.
Confirm no provider-query rewrite ships in the 48-hour observation window.Approval advances only this step. It does not merge or deploy anything.
Review decisionSentiko follows the work into production, evaluates the registered success and guard metrics, records failed or inconclusive attempts, and feeds every measured outcome back into the system model and playbook.
One plan, every surface
You should not have to babysit another console. Every surface projects the same system context, plan, pending decisions, and current outcome—with the depth appropriate to that moment.
Explore the cross-surface prototypeHealthy heartbeat, meaningful movement, and precise escalations only when the plan needs a person.
System model, plan strategy, evidence, alternatives, challenges, outcomes, and audit history.
Affected workload, risk, checks, rollback, and verification follow the work into normal code review.
Optional generated dashboards, observation windows, infrastructure context, and bounded actions.
Assignment, sprint, notes, and status stay aligned without turning a ticket into the evidence store.
Precise production evidence, active-plan context, and guarded workflow commands inside the developer loop.
Autonomous follow-through, honest conclusions
When a step fails, evidence changes, or production is noisy, Sentiko preserves what happened and re-plans. It can say the outcome failed, the evidence conflicted, or more context is required.
See an inconclusive outcome in the prototypeThe registered metric moved and guard metrics held.
The attempt is preserved and the initiative returns to planning.
Missing power or a confounder blocks a stronger claim.
Trust before access
Sentiko is useful because it sees across production and application boundaries. Its access, authority, evidence rules, and human control points are therefore part of the product—not deployment footnotes.
Metadata and safe statistics only. Sentiko receives no table-data access and no production write credentials.
Routine steps advance inside explicit guardrails. Sentiko asks a precise question when judgment is required, then carries the answer through the plan.
BYOC and in-VPC deployment are first-class. Raw telemetry, source, and the outcome ledger stay inside your environment.
Evidence source, freshness, confidence, alternatives, and the rule behind every verdict remain available for review.
Persistent context, not one-shot reasoning
Every investigation, constraint, decision, challenge, failed attempt, and measured result updates the same persistence-layer memory. The next plan begins with everything the system and team have already learned.
Inspect a plan in the prototypeBuilt for application teams
Sentiko gives tech leads and platform engineers the whole-system context and maintained plan that database ownership otherwise demands they reconstruct and coordinate by hand.
Postgres is on the critical pathRDS, Aurora, Cloud SQL, Supabase, Neon, or self-managed.
Persistence work crosses organizational boundariesApplication, platform, infrastructure, and observability context all shape the right plan.
You want agent follow-through, not another advisorHuman-confirmed where judgment matters; ambient orchestration everywhere else.
Design-partner program
We’re working with a small group of Postgres teams to validate how system context becomes a plan that actually keeps moving. Start with a short conversation about where persistence work gets stuck today—no connection required.
Questions we expect
No. The console is for scrutiny, control, and audit. Routine operation arrives through a weekly heartbeat and the surfaces your team already uses. Sentiko escalates only a precise decision or blocker.
Yes. Run a complete persistence-layer audit or scope one to a service, code path, query, schema, table, recent change, or risk category. On-demand findings join the same context, prioritization, and planning workflow as continuous detections.
No. A pull request is one possible step in a broader plan. Sentiko also builds system context, prioritizes initiatives, coordinates human and agent work, manages observations, follows deployments, verifies outcomes, and preserves what the system learned.
No. Sentiko reads database metadata and safe operational statistics through a restricted role. Any change still moves through the customer-controlled system appropriate to that step.
No. Direct Postgres evidence supports the complete workflow. Datadog is an optional source of application and infrastructure context for teams that already use it.
You define the guardrails. Sentiko can autonomously advance routine analysis, planning, coordination, and observation steps. Judgment-heavy changes remain human-confirmed, and production writes stay in customer-controlled systems.
Sentiko records a not-resolved outcome, preserves the attempt, and returns the initiative to planning. If the evidence is too weak or contradictory, it reports an inconclusive result rather than inventing confidence.